Access Now list of black male pornstars prime online video. No monthly payments on our media source. Get lost in in a wide array of expertly chosen media highlighted in excellent clarity, perfect for select viewing devotees. With brand-new content, you’ll always stay on top of with the most recent and compelling media tailored to your preferences. Locate themed streaming in high-fidelity visuals for a deeply engaging spectacle. Connect with our media center today to browse select high-quality media with absolutely no charges, no recurring fees. Stay tuned for new releases and investigate a universe of exclusive user-generated videos designed for prime media admirers. Make sure to get exclusive clips—download quickly available to everyone for free! Stay tuned to with direct access and plunge into choice exclusive clips and begin to watch instantly! Access the best of list of black male pornstars uncommon filmmaker media with crystal-clear detail and select recommendations.

I have a piece of code here that is supposed to return the least common element in a list of elements, ordered by commonality Sometimes you just don't know if there is a pretty solution to satisfy the compiler. From collections import counter c = counte.

The first, [:], is creating a slice (normally often used for getting just part of a list), which happens to contain the entire list, and thus is effectively a copy of the list But java generics is too complicated, and it is not perfect The second, list(), is using the actual list type constructor to create a new list which has contents equal to the first list.

The first way works for a list or a string

The second way only works for a list, because slice assignment isn't allowed for strings Other than that i think the only difference is speed It looks like it's a little faster the first way Try it yourself with timeit.timeit () or preferably timeit.repeat ().

Note that the question was about pandas tolist vs to_list Pandas.dataframe.values returns a numpy array and numpy indeed has only tolist Indeed, if you read the discussion about the issue linked in the accepted answer, numpy's tolink is the reason why pandas used tolink and why they did not deprecate it after introducing to_list. If your list of lists comes from a nested list comprehension, the problem can be solved more simply/directly by fixing the comprehension

Please see how can i get a flat result from a list comprehension instead of a nested list?

The most popular solutions here generally only flatten one level of the nested list See flatten an irregular (arbitrarily nested) list of lists for solutions that. If it was public and someone cast it to list again, where was the difference A list uses an internal array to handle its data, and automatically resizes the array when adding more elements to the list than its current capacity, which makes it more easy to use than an array, where you need to know the capacity beforehand.

List is an interface, you cannot instantiate an interface, because interface is a convention, what methods should have your classes In order to instantiate, you need some realizations (implementations) of that interface. The notation list<?> means a list of something (but i'm not saying what) Since the code in test works for any kind of object in the list, this works as a formal method parameter

Using a type parameter (like in your point 3), requires that the type parameter be declared

The java syntax for that is to put <t> in front of the function This is exactly analogous to declaring formal parameter. You must be sure that at runtime the list contains nothing but customer objects Critics say that such casting indicates something wrong with your code

You should be able to tweak your type declarations to avoid it

OPEN